Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I love shooting wildlife but can’t justify (wife would kill me) the $13K for the Sony A-Mount 500mm. I did quite a bit of research and trying to find what other people were doing and in the end I chose the Canon FDn 500mm f/4.5. I found that people talked highly of this lens, its glass and its weight. I found one almost mint condition from a camera dealer in Japan on eBay so I bought it. I also purchased the Canon 1.4x-A FD Mount Extender. I also bought the Fotodiox Pro Canon FD to Sony E-Mount adapter (Pro is better right?) which I cannot recommend at all. The reason being there is a ring on the mount that allows you to basically hold a bar inside the lens so that the manual aperture ring on the lens works. Well the ring on the adapter has no detent or anything to help keep it in position so the ring walks back to the install position I guess due to vibration of the vehicle. Anyhow I keep having to check it as otherwise I will lose aperture control and I think in the end I will end up taping it after installing to keep it from moving.

 

In my testing with a target I find the f/4.5 to bit a little soft (still better than the Sigma 150-500mm at its best) and then goes tack sharp at f/6.7. The aperture ring is marked in full stops but it has detents at half stops.

 

So I got to go out and give it a real world test yesterday and wouldn’t you know it there were hardly any birds out at the wildlife sanctuary!  However, I did find some young Night Heron’s and a Snowy Egret to practice on. I am attaching links to some pictures I took using this lens with the 1.4 TC installed and I am impressed with the sharpness I must say. I do need a lot more practice with manual focusing though as I find if I can get the frame filled with the subject I can nail focus otherwise I have some really sharp pictures of grass and sticks both in front of and behind the subject while the subject is out of focus. So it will be a learning experience J

 

Be kind with the pictures I did not have a lot to pick from and I was basically just playing with the lens. 

 

The sharpness of this lens is awesome. I am using an A7MII and looking at the picture in Lightroom the detail is amazing. For example in this picture there is a tiny little spider on his head above his eye! 

 

https://flic.kr/p/z9ubYv

 

And some more

 

https://flic.kr/p/z8syc9

 

https://flic.kr/p/ycBkia

 

https://flic.kr/p/z7bo5s

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been using the FD 500 L for a few months now and IMHO it's quite a good value for those who are OK with manual focus.  I typically add some saturation so its color will come close to my Leica 280mm f/4

 

anhumm27.jpg

 

fehawk06.jpg

 

rnphea03.jpg

 

I agree the Fotodiox adapter isn't the best for this lens.  This adapter works fine with the FD 300mm f/4 L but the 500's aperture lever is a little different and requires a longer actuating pin on the adapter.  I have a cheap Fotasy adapter that works with both lenses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Shooting a cactus flower is probably where you do want to have nice bokeh. I can't recall which camera you're shooting, or maybe you haven't said, but using live view you can see what the shot will look like before you press the button. Try setting up on a flower or something stationary where you can control the background and see the changes different settings make. 
    • That's what I got from your post here: When shooting at f/11, bokeh is indeed not something you should be concerned with, unless when shooting closeup. Nearly all lenses have a polygonal iris shape at f/11 which naturally gives a more edgy rendering of out of focus areas. @Cameratose's example is perfect for demonstrating the relevance of bokeh. To some extent you can influence the backdrop of a shot, but if it is busy foliage relatively close by, it'd better not be distracting from your subject. Some lenses are able to create a more pleasing background than others, even at the same aperture setting and focal length. For the impact of the entire image one might even argue that the smoothness of the background is as relevant as the sharpness of the subject.
    • Like Cameratose, I usually go for as much depth of field as I can, but sometimes there is no getting around out of focus areas, such as a closeup of a cactus flower.  I guess, everything else being equal, I might be concerned about a lenses bokeh, but everything else is seldom equal.  At this point in my photography I think I have bigger problems than unattractive bokeh.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...