Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I had this lens and used it for a while with my A7R.  My copy was sharp us close and was still sharp at infinity, and had decent bokeh for a wide angle; it was a very, very good lens.  But I put mine on Craigslist when the Batis 25 was announced and I am very happy with the decision.  I have already taken about 300 shots with my new Batis 25 and it is simply a fantastic lens.  I bought it partially for the autofocus, but mostly because of the electronic communication with the camera.  I have been shocked to discover as added bonuses that it is even sharper than the Zeiss 25mm ZF.2 and has really, really nice bokeh wide open.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that info Jimmy. I don't mean to question your judgement here but are you positive the Batis is sharper than the ZF.2?? I know they are different lenses with the ZF having an extra element I think. Basically, I just want to make sure you are confident that the Batis is the better lens because if it is then sweet as the autofocus is handy to have as well!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Christo25.  I did not own both lenses at the same time, so I never had a chance to do a head to head test, and so I have no hard evidence to point to.  But sharpness matters a lot to me (probably too much), and my subjective observation on the Batis 25 images is consistent razor sharpness to a degree that I did not see in my ZF.2 images.  And I am always paying attention to sharpness.  Now its possible the adapter had a part in this, but I was using a high quality Novoflex adapter.  So not 100% sure, but a high degree of confidence.  What I am extremely confident of is that the Batis is at least as sharp as the ZF.2, and IMHO has nicer bokeh and better colors. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting, I will wait until people start posting some RAW files online. Luminous Landscape posted some jpegs to download at 100 percent but I wasn't very impressed with the results I could see there but the reviewer doing it may have not been so fussy with the focusing, who knows?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • It seems entirely reasonable that they disable a video mode that requires a bit rate faster than any standard SD card can manage to an SD card (SD cards can be rated V30, V60, or V90) - if you try to record a video mode that would require something faster like a "V200" card then they don't let you.  OK, you have some non-standard hack that pretends to be an SD card, but records faster - seems perfectly sensible that they don't support it considering they look at the card to know how fast a rate the card can handle.  Pretty sure that Sony is protecting users who try to use a slow SD card to record a video mode that requires more speed than the card supports, and Sony has the camera say "you can't do that" rather than fail dismally to try to record it - can you imagine the complaints if the user got a recording that stuttered and captured a few frames then a gap then a few more frames? Feel free to complain, but don't expect sympathy. You tried  something that isn't supported, and it didn't work. As far as I know, Sony cameras are the only ones that support two different formats of cards, AND let you have two matching cards of either format. Every other camera that supports two formats has one of each. There are quite a few cameras that support two matching slots, but they only support one format of card (eg: the Z9 support two CFexpressB cards), so you don't have the option of a second format. I like the flexibility - I don't have have enough CFeA cards to cover everything - I can use CFeA for some and SD for others. Yes, CFexpressA cards were fairly expensive in the beginning (back 4 years ago in the A1), and I paid a fair bit for a Sony 180GB CFeA card. But a few years later I spent the same amount for a Lexus CFeA 320GB card, and just recently I spent almost exactly the same amount for a Prograde 480FB CFeA V4 card (which is over twice as fast to load into the computer). The price falls as there is more competition. Interestingly, measurements have shown that cameras like the Z9 cannot write at full speed to their CFeB cards (presumably because they get really hot - they write only as fast as CFeA speeds 🙂
    • If I press record when holding the camera vertically the video will be saved in 9:16 instead of 16:9 and I can't fint any option to disable that feature? It is really annoying having thumbnails being flipped 90 degrees in the editing software as well as having to flip the clips on the timeline. It is also very annoying that it is flipped when previewing the clip both in editing software but also in any media player. It happens really often when doing run and gun video (documentary style).
    • The picture profiles DO NOT affect RAW files. That's been said three times now. Even if RAW is affected by gamma, your custom settings don't affect each other, they aren't global.  Let's back up a bit. First off, which camera are you using? My A7 IV and A1 both have the ability to have completely separate profiles for video and stills.  Why can't you simply set up your video button with the settings you want and just push it? That's what I do. I can be shooting stills and if I decide to shoot video I just press the button. No need to move any switches or press any other buttons.          
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...