Jump to content

Has anyone adapted a Nikon 180mm f/2.8 lens to Sony E?

Recommended Posts

Has anyone adapted a Nikon 180mm f/2.8 lens of any vintage to Sony E? I would be most interested in adapting the current Nikon model, since I don’t own one yet.

This is a great lens that weighs less and is smaller tha than a 70-200 f/4 zoom. Nobody by Nikon offers it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I want a 2.8 prime. I am only aware of the Nikon. Once upon a time Olympus offered a 180 f/2.8 for their film SLR system (OM-3, OM-4). Are there any others I should know about. Autofocus is not that important to me, but I do need full functionality with the camera's meter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are a several other 180mm lenses, from the older manual-focus Soligor f3.5, Auto Miranda f3.5, Super Multi-Coated Takumar f2.8,  Zoomatar f1.3(!!!), Super Yashinon-R f3.5, Sonnar f2.8, etc., to the highly rated Tamron f3.5 -- that came in manual-focus and auto-focus versions (Not cheap).

As to FULL functionality with your camera meter, that will depend on the lens and what camera you have -- and how you define "full".

I'm not familiar with the Nikon, but I think Canon has/had one as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Posts

    • I mostly see posterization artifacts, which are the result of lossy compressed RAW files (or bad jpeg conversion). Unfortunately, the A6400 doesn't offer uncompressed or lossless compressed RAW. The noise might indeed result from the smaller sensor than what you're used to. If you're not shooting at max aperture, you could try shooting at wider aperture and lower ISO. When you're not shooting at max aperture, fullframe versus APS-C shouldn't matter much in terms of ISO-performance combined with depth of field: at the same ISO and aperture value, fullframe offers better noise performance but with a narrower depth of field. This can be offset by choosing a larger aperture and lower ISO on the APS-C camera. If you want a fullframe camera the size of an A6400, try the A7C(ii).
    • ..unfortunately, the lighting was correct. The shot required deeper shadows. The K1 ff didnt have these banding issues [yes, I know the sensor is larger]. The film shots had details in the same light. The sony files, both the jpg and raw, had this banding/noise - with NO retouch or post adjustments [straight out of the camera]. the camera was purchased new a few years ago and I am trying to determine if there is something wrong, or the settings are wrong, or the camera just cant handle this kind of lighting [studio + softbox]. No shadow detail is one thing... banding/noise in the shadows is unacceptable. Does sony have a body this size that is FF ? Im wondering if that would make a difference..  dw
    • The root causes for banding are uneven lighting, incorrect exposure settings, or compression artefacts or certain kinds of artificial lighting, especially LED lights. Also the lens used plays a role, I have noticed it more with my sharpest lenses, looks like they outresolve the sensor when I have a uniform blue sky. There is more than one solution, and ultimately post-processing, but the root cause has to be identified first.
  • Topics

  • Create New...