Jump to content

F/2.8 70-200 zoom - choice


Recommended Posts

Photography is just a hobby for me, but my work gives me lots of perfect opportunities to take photos of deer, birds and other wildlife early in the morning, with my full frame Alpha 99, or CSC- Alpha 68

I have an opportunity to spend some of my earnings on a second hand f/2.8 70-200mm zoom.

The options are both in excellent condition, the choice being : 1, Sony f/2.8 G SSM at £650 (was £1530 list price new - back in 2006)

or: 2, Tamron F2.8 SP DI USD at £550 (£1150 new- back in 2014)

If the choice was with new lenses I would buy the Tamron just because it was so much more affordable - but second hand, the difference makes the Sony G master more affordable.

Reviews of the lenses when they were new suggest that the G master is a better quality lens, so I am seriously tempted.

The Tamron scores on being excellent optics for a much lower price (less relevant for the used gear)

Any thoughts? eg:- Is the "super sonic wave motor" in the Sony better than the "ultra sonic drive" of the Tamron?

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

From direct comparison on an American site and from what I can tell from reviews, it looks like the Tamron F2.8 SP Di USD will be my choice over the Sony.

The optics appear to be very similar, but the Tamron's USD focussing appears to be quieter and as quick (although not as accurate in low light).

So the main factors for me are: Apparently the Sony was optimised for cropped sensor, although advertised for use with full frame as well.  Weather sealing (Yes on the Tamron, no on the Sony) and the colour of the body is more discreet - and, of course, it's £100 cheaper.

If the Sony SSM II was in my budget, that would be a different story.

Anyway, when I've taken the plunge I'll let you know if I'm happy with the choice!

Edited by thebeardedgroundsman
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'd use Focus Area: (Expand) Flexible Spot: S instead of Center. Smaller focus area and more control over where to focus. https://helpguide.sony.net/ilc/1710/v1/en/contents/TP0001653124.html
    • New Sony user here, trying to get my head around all of the differences from Fuji 😬  I’ve figured out most of the settings, but can’t find any answers on how to do a custom white balance for studio flash. The custom setting option only seems to be based on measuring ambient light. The only workaround I can think of is to set an approximate kelvin value and then shoot a grey card and fix it in post, but I’d much prefer to get it right in camera.    camera is an A7CR TIA Vinnie 
    • I am not sure what effect you are trying to achieve regarding the bluish cast of the water.  Do you want to neutralize it or enhance it?  It would be best if you Google polarizer filter for camera and look at the images and videos and see if you can find the desired effect that seem to mirror your situation.  If you can't find the effect you are looking for, it may not be possible to do so with the Polarizer.  I use the polarizer to minimize the shimmering reflections in the water that would look distracting in the image. Neutral density filters are used to reduce the amount of light coming into the camera.  If you want to shoot a small waterfall and you want to create an angel veil effect by reducing the shutter speed to seconds but the light conditions won't allow you to do so, you can use neutral density filters to shoot at very slow shutter speeds. Neutral density and polarizing filters can get very expensive.  If your lenses share a common filter size, that would be great.  If not, get the filters for the largest filter diameter lens and get a set of stepping rings to use with your smaller filter diameter lenses.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...