Jump to content

Dark upper corners using FE 35mm/1.8 in small aperture and infinity focus


Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Just bought the lens. Test it and very happy until I noticed dark upper corners, worse in the left. It only show up at small aperture (eg F11 F16 F22)and focus at infinity. The smaller the aperture the worse.
its worst in my A7II. Less noticeable in the A7RII. No hood or filter attached.

Picture shown is taken by A7II:

any idea what’s the cause? Please help. Can see the dark corner in EVF while composing and focusing 

All camera have updated firmware.

 

DE5607EB-4E0B-41ED-9D49-9EEBF979EA2F.jpeg

0381EC7D-C3D9-4E8F-A9F1-5C36881817E1.jpeg

Link to post
Share on other sites

To me this doesn't seem normal: regular vignetting gets less when closing down the aperture, not worse. Also, regular vignetting should be fairly similar for all corners and should gradually reduce towards the center.

In some lenses RAW-files show dark corners like these, but this is by design due to barrel-distortion and a small image circle (after digital correction the image is fine). The FE35 f/1.8 however has very little distortion and you say the dark corners are also in the viewfinder, which should be corrected for distortion. Just to be sure, do double-check if distortion compensation is enabled in your camera.

Given your observation that it gets worse when closing down and focussing at infinity, to me it sounds like something at the rear side of your lens is obstructing light rays from hitting the sensor. A small aperture combined with infinity focus results in very parallel light rays hitting the sensor, making physical obstructions close to the sensor very visible (also used as a method to spot dust on the sensor).

Perhaps have a look at the rear side of your lens to see if you can spot anything irregular, like a loose/shifted baffle.

Edited by Pieter
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Pieter said:

To me this doesn't seem normal: regular vignetting gets less when closing down the aperture, not worse. Also, regular vignetting should be fairly similar for all corners and should gradually reduce towards the center.

In some lenses RAW-files show dark corners like these, but this is by design due to barrel-distortion and a small image circle (after digital correction the image is fine). The FE35 f/1.8 however has very little distortion and you say the dark corners are also in the viewfinder, which should be corrected for distortion. Just to be sure, do double-check if distortion compensation is enabled in your camera.

Given your observation that it gets worse when closing down and focussing at infinity, to me it sounds like something at the rear side of your lens is obstructing light rays from hitting the sensor. A small aperture combined with infinity focus results in very parallel light rays hitting the sensor, making physical obstructions close to the sensor very visible (also used as a method to spot dust on the sensor).

Perhaps have a look at the rear side of your lens to see if you can spot anything irregular, like a loose/shifted baffle.

Checked. The rear end of the lens looks fine to me. Thanks for suggestions.

lens compensation is on for all parameters too. 

Edited by eggwah123
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't own this specific lens so can't double-check if other copies behave the same. Perhaps some other reader can?

I'd be pretty annoyed if this was my lens: sounds like the lens is engineered slightly too tight. If you still have warranty I'd check with the store if they can let you try another copy.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Pieter said:

I don't own this specific lens so can't double-check if other copies behave the same. Perhaps some other reader can?

I'd be pretty annoyed if this was my lens: sounds like the lens is engineered slightly too tight. If you still have warranty I'd check with the store if they can let you try another copy.

Just received it two days ago. Will return it. But still want to know the cause and may be It’s a simple issue to resolve Without returning it.. Googled and found no one reported any similar issues. That’s strange or I am just exceptionally unlucky.

Anyone own this lens can run a test? F22 and focus at infinity. Any dark corners like the picture I posted above?

Edited by eggwah123
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Lenstip just tested this lens and, interestingly, their findings seem to agree with yours: when stopping down, in general the vignetting gets less but the extreme corners seriously lag behind. This causes the corners to stand out more in apparent darkness at small apertures. In their case however all corners are similarly dark, so there was something decentered in your copy.

https://www.lenstip.com/593.8-Lens_review-Sony_FE_35_mm_f_1.8_Vignetting.html

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Pieter said:

Lenstip just tested this lens and, interestingly, their findings seem to agree with yours: when stopping down, in general the vignetting gets less but the extreme corners seriously lag behind. This causes the corners to stand out more in apparent darkness at small apertures. In their case however all corners are similarly dark, so there was something decentered in your copy.

https://www.lenstip.com/593.8-Lens_review-Sony_FE_35_mm_f_1.8_Vignetting.html

Returned it by post already. Hopefully Sony will admit the defect and tell me what is the defect. Unlikely though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Posts

    • I'm only talking about the Minolta lenses before MAXXUM -- so they were all manual focusing.  Only one -- the first -- was labelled "ROKKOR".  And you are correct, the last version was labelled "MINOLTA", but made made by Cosina.  The differences between the six versions are not huge -- such as changes to the inscription of the lens, changes to the lens coating, changes to the optical design, changes to the close-focusing ability, etc.  You can see the specs on each version at: http://www.subclub.org/minman/287035.htm But I've never heard of one with a wider filter thread.  That's not listed on this great Minolta lens list either: http://minolta.eazypix.de/lenses/ I would be very interested in seeing a picture of your 35-70mm ROKKOR with a wider filter thread.  You might have a really rare lens! Here's what I know about the only 35-70mm ROKKOR: FOCAL LENGTH: 35-70mm f-STOPS: 3.5-22 PERIOD: 1977-1981 INSCRIPTION: MINOLTA MD ZOOM ROKKOR-X 35-70mm 1:3.5 LENS MADE IN JAPAN DESIGN: 8/7 FILTER: 55 DIAPHRAGM: auto MC: yes MD: yes CLOSE FOCUS: 3.3' SIZE: 2.7"x2.6" WEIGHT: 12.9oz. A new lens to the Minolta line-up of SLR lenses in the MD Rokkor-X series. A two-touch, super-quality zoom that Leica liked so much they sold it as the Leitz Vario-Elmar R 35-70 f3.5. Its main limitation is its limited close-focusing ability. Since it is a two-touch zoom, it's not too convenient to use, but the quality makes up for its other deficiencies.
    • 6 versions of 35-70 ? Really ? Are you counting AF in the 6 ? I know of only 4 one of which was not even made by Minolta (the 3.5-4.8 version)  The first version of the 35-70mm F 3.5 (MD ZOOM ROKKOR (X)) had similar separate threads for its lens shade of about 62mm but like i mentioned, that shade won't fit on either the 40-80 nor the Shift CA. After revisiting them, this shade won't even fit a 62mm filter by about 1mm. So i guess this one is 63mm which is not a standard filter size. The shade thread diameter on both of my SHIFT CA ROKKOR's  are also close to 62mm but they appear to be closer to 64-65mm since they won't fit either on a 62mm filter but by a larger margin than the 35-70 shade. It also won't fit on a 67mm threaded lens being too small. So about 64-65mm here Finally, the shade for the 40-80 is 62mm since i can fit it to a 62mm filter.   So i guess what we have here is: -1-62mm (Zoom Rokkor 4-80) - 1 about 63mm MD ZOOM Rokkor) - 1 about 64-65mm (Shift CA Rokkor) My measuring tools are all in storage after i just moved so this is the closest i could get to compare all 3    
    • Minolta made six versions of 35-70mm zoom and all of them had only one filter thread -- 55mm -- unlike the 40-80mm zoom and the 35mm CA Shift lenses, which both had two front threads -- the inner one for filters and the outer one for the lens shade/hood.  On both, the filter thread was 55mm.  The shade thread on the 40-80mm is 62mm.  The question is what is the diameter of the shade thread of the 35mm CA Shift lens?  The photo (thank you) looks much wider than 62mm to my naked eye.
    • te rely but here we go.   This shade does have what appears to be 62mm threads but the same could apply to both the 40-80 zoom and the 35-70 F 3.5 MD Zoom Rokkor (1st version) but i own all 3 lenses and the shades of all of them can not fit on the other 2 lenses for a reason i can not understand. So your search should be on the actual original shade
    • This issue has caused me such a headache. I agree it is really mind boggling that Sony doesn't allow you to turn this setting off. I haven't had a chance to test yet but I believe this may be the solution: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bh_gfEsFGtA
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...