Jump to content

SONY A7RIII how do i CLEAN IT?!?!?! the sensors...


Recommended Posts

Dust on the sensor happens all the time with mirrorless cameras. Best to get a routine in cleaning it regularly.

First try in-camera dust removal (will shake sensor using IBIS-mechanism, hoping dust will come loose). Usually this doesn't help much though.

Second, try a rocket blower. Hold the camera with the mount pointing downward (so any loose dust in the housing will fall down and not land on the sensor) and use the rocket blower some 10-20 times. Works best if you hold it close to the sensor, but be careful not to hit the sensor with the tip of the rocket blower. This usually solves 90% of the problems.

Lastly, you might consider a wet clean of your sensor. If you don't feel confident about doing this yourself, best let a specialized camera store do it: it's a routine job for them.

I'd strongly suggest to stay away from those gel sticks as there are plenty of horror stories to be found on the net: gel residue being left on the sensor, or the adhesive on the gel stick being so strong it takes away more than just dust...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't be squeamish. Learn to do it yourself. Likely cost $40 each time for a cleaning not considering the time it takes to drop off & pick up the piece only to have something contaminate it again 3 days later. In 5 years I've done mine maybe 8 times.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a wet cleaning kit too, though since getting the arctic butterfly I have not needed it. If there is moisture on the lens, droplets etc. then the wet cleaning is the way to go. 
If its just dust, which for me is most of the time, then the butterfly gets rid of it every time and is much quicker.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Posts

    • Haven’t you tried using a program that would correct the barrel distortion of whichever lens you might choose to use or buy? There are many, but from the ones I know, I can recommend DXO Photolab, that automatically corrects optical distortions of most lenses suitable for Sony cameras and with which you can develop your raw files. I have checked with the version of the DxO Photolab I have which is not the newest version, and (just as an example) it does include the profile for the Sigma 24-70mm F/2.8 lens mounted on a Sony AS ii. You might be able to check if the newer version of the program includes the profile for the Sony AS iii as well. I think that buying a program that efficiently corrects optical distortions of lenses would be a cheaper option than buying a lens that would have no distortion at all (which is kind of impossible if thinking of a zoom lens).
    • Had the same problem but it wasn't the dummy. Mine FIRST started with the dummy but soon migrated to EVERY battery swapped out. Lived with that massive inconvenience for a year before I sent the camera in for repair of a wonkified menu system. Though there's no user swappable memory battery there must be an internal one that keeps a wee amount of power keeping things charged when the battery flatlines.
    • Hello, I do a lot of clothing photography (the clothes are laid flat and the camera is overhead facing the ground about 3.5-4 ft above) and I currently use a Sony A6000 with a sigma 16mm lens. It works pretty good. There is some barrel distortion which I guess is to be expected.  I am looking to upgrade to a FF (likely Sony AS iii) and I'm exploring lens choice. I'm considering the sigma 24mm-70mm F2.8 DG DN art lens because I'm hoping to buy one lens to not only satisfy my clothing photography needs, but also do portraits, video, ect. ect. Sigma also seems somewhat equivalent to the Sony G series and lot cheaper.  Would using a prime lens really be beneficial over a zoom one for my clothing photography? I'd like to avoid barrel distortion if possible but I'm also trying to avoid buying a bunch of costly equipment. Open to all ideas and advice. 
    • Olaf!!!!! I just did a test with my GH5 with 120fps and it has the same effect!! So i guess its the IKEA light 🙂 Tanks for your input again.  
    • Hi Olaf. Thanks for the input.  Its artificial light from IKEA 🙂   I just tested again and the effect is much more visible shooting in 60 or 120fps. By 24fps its moderate. But the footage would be unusable. I really don't know what to do. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...