Jump to content
fwolff

24 f1.4 GM in crop mode vs 35mm lens.

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Does anyone have experience with comparing the image quality of the 24 f1.4 GM in crop mode ( 24mm = 36mm in crop ) with that of any other 35mm lens. I know in the crop mode, there is a drop in file size and an increase in minimum Depth of Field ( f1.4.= f2.1 in crop ) My question is strictly image quality and any other differences in the way the 24 f1.4 operates (focusing speed, bokeh quality, color shifts, minimum focus, etc.).

Thanks,

FW

Edited by fwolff

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I have done a quick test, comparing the two lenses mounted on the A7RIV. Comparing  the 35mm with a 61MP picture and the 24mm with a 26MP picture may be misleading. The fact that you use the APSC crop mode for the 24mm has consequences : you loose some definition and then sharpness.The field curvature is of course not exactly the same.  To get the same size when comparing the pictures you need to crop more for the 24mm picture. The 100% cropped 24mm (26MP) picture has the same size on your screen as the 67% cropped 35mm (61MP) picture. With this level of cropping there is no visible difference in IQ between the two pictures : they look pretty good.

But if you crop further, the 35mm picture wins both in the center and in the corners.

If you forget this test, and based on my own experience with the two lenses, both are quite good. They are small, light and very easy to use. But the 24mm, which is a real gem, is  sharper than the 35mm when compared on an arms length basis. To get the very best 35mm, you need to choose the Sigma 35 F1.2, but at the cost of big size and weight. I am quite happy to keep the two Sony lenses in my bag.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Posts

    • A9 with the latest (5+) firmware can do PDAF down to f/16, while the A7Riii can only do PDAF down to f/8, so depending on your shooting conditions, the A9 may be a better choice.
    • Since you're specifically asking for an "RGB" histogram: I'm afraid, this is not possible. However, If you're fine with an "intensity" histogram without differentiating for RGB, then maybe you'll want to take a look at this.
    • I want to do focus bracketing with my Sony A7 r4. I want to shoot in raw and do not want the results stacked in camera (I want to do that later.)   Are there products that will do this for me?
    • When you review your image after capture you can view a RGB Histogram. Is it possible to view this RGB Live Histogram by assigning it to a C1, C2 etc button, which you can press to view it before you take the shot, rather than  after the capture.
    • I am seriously changing my equipment to the Sony range. With my current eyesight I need the most consistent and accurate Eye AF for non static people shots. The 24 or 42 meg sensors are not an issue, both would be fine. Any advice regarding the A9 vs A7R111 would be most appreciated regarding the Eye AF.
×
×
  • Create New...