Jump to content

can a-mount lens work full frame on an a7rii camera

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I purchased a la-ea3 adapter to use on my newly purchased a7rii camera to use my existing old minolta lenses.

looking at the a-mount lens charts , I see no a-mount lenses listed that will work full frame on the a7rii camera.

the chart says the angle of view will be treated as aps-c and auto-cropped.

Is this correct, or are there any old a-mount or screw-mount lenses that will perform full frame using some type of

adapter on the a7rii camera?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Almost all Minolta A-Mount lenses were full frame. The only ones that are APS-C are marked DT and are:

- 18-70 DT

-18-200 DT

- 11-18 DT


Same DT marking would apply to Sony lenses that were APS-C but the list would be a little longer


There would be a limitation if one used LA-EA1 or LA-EA2 with these FF lenses


What chart are you referring to ? 

Edited by michelb
Link to post
Share on other sites

ILCE-6300 – support.dimaging.sony.co.jp

This the the place my fumbling around for research on lenses for the alpha a7rii sent me to.

It list a lot of different older lenses and indicates if they will appear in full frame or aps-c.

I was assuming it was correct about most of the older a-mount lenses, but I hope you guys are

correct, as I have also ordered adapters for canon and pentax lenses as well..    thanks for the

prompt answer to my inqiry, as I don't really know yet how to navigate thru this forum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you select ILCE7RMII, the lenses that do not indicate full frame are the ones that have DT in their model designation like i mentioned.

The Minolta A-Mount lenses were almost all full frame except for the 3 i listed in my previous post. Sony had a better selection of DT lenses since they were developing the line but these also have DT in their model names.

So in that page , if you only look for the ones with a small square that says full frame. You will notice almost all Minolta lenses do not mention this ( i don't understand why) but they do and many have a clone in the Sony that are mentioned full frame ( 16 Fisheye, 20mm, 28mm F 2.8, 50mm F 1.4, 300mm F 2.8, 500F8 RF, 50 and 100mm Macro lenses)

Sony probably does not want to over-promote the older lenses !!!

Edited by michelb
Link to post
Share on other sites

l clicked on the detailed explanation on each of the lenses on the chart, and the only ones that are not treated as aps-c are the ones that have a check mark on them, and the only ones like that are prefix SEL.  All the other prefixes regardless of conditions, are

treated as aps-c (according to the notations in the detailed list of specifications for that lens).



Link to post
Share on other sites

SEL prefix is E-Mount so there would be no need for LA-EA adapter of any kind


Take it from someone who owns over 60 A-Mount lenses from Minolta and Sony + numerous E-mount bodies and lenses + LA-EA1, EA2, EA3, EA4 adapters (right, i have all models right now):

Any A-Mount lens that does not mention DT in its designation, is full frame and remains full frame when used with LA-EA3 an LA-EA4 on a full frame E-Mount body

Some very rare lenses like the Minolta 3X-1X macro is incompatible with the LA-adapters. Same applies to APO lenses with the APO teleconverters.


ALL others will work in full frame with your LA-EA3 and A7Rii but with screw-driven lenses (non-SSM or SAM which is the vast majority of the lenses made by Minolta and Sony) you will only get them to work in Manual focus. To get AF with these you need to use LA-EA4.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand, and was only going by what the Sony chart said. I appreciate the good news from

someone who has actually experienced the old a-mount minolta lenses on the a7rii. It is re-assuring

to me to find my old lenses will work using all 42 megapixels.  (I will probably end up having to get

a larger hard drive for storage.)  I was already resloved to using them in manual mode.

thanks, again for your input..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • What does each of those 7 clicks represent, do you get full stop's worth of reduction in the shutter speed per click as the diaphragm closes down?
    • Perfectly understandable - American Greenback rules in most countries, not much different in Canada though without the 2 tier exchange rates.  Let us know when you have it and show us what it can do.
    • Here, in my country, our economy has always been very peculiar, unstable, and full of ups and downs. Nowadays, the official rate of exchange for the US dollar is 1 dollar = 103 AR pesos ($). This is also the rate that applies to importers. People in general are allowed to buy 200 dollars per month at this rate if they go to a Bank, but no more. But the unofficial dollar rate (what we call de “Blue dollar”) is 1 dollar = 182 AR $. This is what they give you if you go to a currency exchange house (not a Bank) and sell a dollar that you have. These are the rates for today, the 16th of September. Sony, here in my country, is saying that they are selling at the same prices as in the USA. So, at the official exchange rate, this would be, for the 28-60 lens, something as: 500 x 103 = 51.500 AR $. Sony is here selling the 28-60 for 59.000 AR $. Then, 59.000 AR $ / 182 AR $  = 324 US dollars. Therefore, if I sell 324 US dollars that I had saved, they give me 59.000 AR $ with which I can buy the lens. On the other hand, most people that are selling second hand stuff, are willing to recover part of what they paid for a product when the exchange was different and not favourable for buying imported things. Therefore, second hand stuff is not cheap in relation to new stuff nowadays (for how long, nobody knows). Sony, here, is no longer selling the 28-70 lens (at least, not for the time being). Things have not always been the same, and they might change how knows when, so this might be the right time to buy new Sony stuff (if having some savings). These are the reasons why you can’t find in North America the Sony lens at the same amount of money than me, at this particular moment. I know, difficult to understand, it is madness, and can’t last, but for the time being........ So maybe I should buy the Sony 28-60mm lens and have a native AF lens as you say, specially as they are saying it is a good kit lens. Thanks
    • I am not recommending either of the kit lens, the reviews on the web suggest 28-60 is a good lens how much better than 28-70 can't be seen without someone doing a head to head comparison. If you are buying your first native FE lens on a budget, the 28-60 seem like a good option and the price you have quoted for it, I am not seeing it in North America.  I have the 28-70, it was part of an A7II kit (very lightly used) with 3 oem batteries and an oem charger for basically the price of the body on consignment at a local camera store.  I don't use it much but it's always handy to have a native AF lens to grab for quick snapshots when needed.
  • Topics

  • Create New...