Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'a7r4'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Sony Alpha Forum

  • News and General Discussions
    • Sony Alpha News & Rumors
    • General Discussions about Sony Alpha
  • Sony Alpha Full Frame
    • Sony Alpha Full Frame Cameras
    • Sony Alpha Full Frame Lenses
  • Sony Alpha APS-C / Sony NEX
    • Sony Alpha APS-C and NEX Cameras
    • Sony Alpha APS-C Lenses
  • Sony A-Mount
    • Sony A-Mount System
  • Sony Alpha Post Processing
    • Sony Alpha RAW Converting and Image Editing
  • Adapting Lenses
    • Legacy Lenses
    • Adapters & Speedboosters
    • Showcase Adapted Lenses
  • Showcase Sony Alpha Photos
    • People
    • Nature & Wildlife
    • Landscape & Travel
    • Architecture
    • Misc
  • Sony Alpha Video
    • Sony Alpha Video Discussion
    • Video Showcase
  • About the Sony Alpha Forum
    • About the Sony Alpha Forum
    • Newbie / Self Introduction

Product Groups

  • Widgets

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location


Interests

Found 12 results

  1. Jeffreykmd

    Sloth

    © Jeffrey M. Kopita

  2. A Day at the Aquarium

    © Jeffrey M. Kopita

  3. © Jeffrey M. Kopita

  4. © Jeffrey M. Kopita

  5. Please Sony consider to add this feature for macro photography... It's essential and you can save a lot of time during your production! Please Help!
  6. #include <iostream> #include <iomanip> #include "../CRSDK/CameraRemote_SDK.h" #include "Text.hpp" int main(int argc, const char * argv[]) { auto init_success = SCRSDK::Init(); if (!init_success) { SDKTest::tout << "Failed to initialize Remote SDK. Terminating.\n"; // cr_lib->Release(); SCRSDK::Release(); std::exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } SDKTest::tout << "SDK successuflly initialized. \n\n"; CrInt32u version = SCRSDK::GetSDKVersion(); int major = (version & 0xFF000000) >> 24; int minor = (version & 0x00FF0000) >> 16; int patch = (version & 0x0000FF00) >> 8; SDKTest::tout << "Remote SDK version: "; SDKTest::tout << major << "." << minor << "." << std::setfill(TEXT('0')) << std::setw(2) << patch << "\n"; SCRSDK::ICrEnumCameraObjectInfo* camera_list = nullptr; auto enum_status = SCRSDK::EnumCameraObjects(&camera_list); if (CR_FAILED(enum_status) || camera_list == nullptr) { SDKTest::tout << "Current Status: " << enum_status << "\n"; SDKTest::tout << "No cameras detected. Connect a camera and retry.\n"; // cr_lib->Release(); SCRSDK::Release(); std::exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } SDKTest::tout << "Current Status:" << enum_status << "\n"; SCRSDK::Release(); } The above is my code for testing SONY CameraRemote SDK 1.3.0 using A7R4, and "Text.hpp" is from the source code in official sample app of CameraRemoteSDK, and my problem is when the camera is not connected, SCRSDK::EnumCameraObjects returns 0 which means CrError_None and this is OK, however when I connected my A7R4, it returns Error 1, but in the definition of CrError.h there is no error or warning code 1, and the sample app works normally, could anyone help with my problem? Thanks in advance!
  7. Anyone using a Wi-Fi extender successfully with the a7R4?
  8. Hello all, I've recently purchased a Sony a7R4, and installed two SD cards. I've set it up to sort write RAW & JPEG images, which appears to work correctly, writing RAW files & videos to primary SD card (slot 1), and JPEGs to slot 2. However I have trouble accessing the JPEGs - when connecting the camera to a Windows 10 machine, it shows the camera & internal storage, but that only accesses first SD card. To get the files off the second SD card I have to eject it & use an SD reader. The directory structure also seems different on the second card. Does anyone know of a workaround, or have a preferred way of accessing the files from multiple SD cards?
  9. The level display on the a7r4 is extremely inaccurate-- shots can need over a full degree of adjustment in both axes (axies? axis?) after the fact even when the display reads as fully leveled (all green). This basically makes the level useless for shots any straight lines in the photo (which I think is the whole point of a level???)-- my Canon cameras are all much more accurate (maybe needing .3 degrees of adjustment at most). Can this somehow be improved in firmware?? Really disappointed that a multi-thousand dollar camera is so inaccurate, and I have to waste resolution and time by having to rotate /distort images to be squared up.
×
×
  • Create New...