Search the Community

Canon 50mm F 0.95 Mount: Canon S( unique Bayonet mount specific to this lens) year: 1960-1970(circa) aperture range: F 0.95 thru F 16 7 elements in 5 groups, 10 aperture blades Length (mm): 60mm weight (g): 605 Adapter: Obtained via Ebay http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/182084450770?_trksid=p2057872.m2749.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT. After almost two years of consideration I became the owner of a Canon 50mm F0.95 lens. I finally obtained one reasonably affordably when a Westlicht Auctions in Vienna( where I live) were auctioning one at a time that coincided with my bank account having enough in it for me to bid. This rare lens has a small but strong following and is often found modified to Leica M mount. Exculding prototypes there are two variants a range finder coupled and a TV version. The version I have is Range finder coupled. My long consideration before purchasing was due to the combination of two important issues, cost and adaptability to my Sony A7rII. I have made the mistake in the past of leaping to buy a legacy lens, due to the enthusiastic reviews of others, and then finding it didn't perform in a manner I liked. The "dream lens", as many have come to call it, has many enthusiastic reviews but very few cautionary tales. Noting the usual selling price from US$2000.00 through to US$3500.00 I was concerned that the hype might not match the "bucks" needed to obtain one. The issues I was worried about before buying was Vignetting( a reported issue with Range finder lenses and FF E-mount cameras) and softness. Well I got the lens and now after nearly a month of ownership I can say clearly both those issues are present with the lens. However I no longer care, I suspect every time I am out with this lens on my camera I am smiling. Its important to be clear this is no where near a perfect lens; its soft, it suffers from internal reflections, flare, spherical aberration, vignetting and its heavy and clunky( built like a world war II Tank). If you want a sharp F 0.95 lens then you wouldn't want to go near this 1960s - early 1970s lens, instead its either the Mitakon speedmaster or the Leica Noctilux you should be going for. What I wanted, and got from the lens was the dream like bokeh and the 1930s film-star-glow the lens produces when wide open. If you want a legacy lens with Bokeh and sharpness you would be much better off with the Minolta Rokkor 58mm F 1.2. The Rokkor will give you bokeh and hair splitting sharpness, but what it won't do is give you the "glow". The Dream lens seems to be a soft focus lens, a few years back I owned the Rokkor 85mm Varisoft, and that lens is the only one that I have used that comes close to what this Canon range finder lens does. Wide open, with the right lens -subject, subject - background distances, subjects, particularly faces, get a secondary glow about them that is reminiscent of the photos taken with the Leitz 90mm Thambar. When you add in phenomenal subject background separation and a unique buttery Bokeh this is a unique art lens. It isn't for every one and I should mention one other significant fault: its size. When adapted to M mount, Leica users find they have to use a credit card ( or similar) to operate the lens release button. On the Sony A7rII the necessary adapter frees Sony users from that problem but for those with hands and fingers larger than Donald Trumps( sorry I couldn't resist) holding the Sony A7rII with the dream lens attached is an issue. In the following photo I have marked with two red lines, the gap between the lens barrel and camera grip. That gap is uncomfortably small and makes managing the lens Camera combination hard. I am seriously considering getting the battery grip to get around this irritation.