Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'Contax-Yashica'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Sony Alpha Forum

  • News and General Discussions
    • Sony Alpha News & Rumors
    • General Discussions about Sony Alpha
  • Sony Alpha Full Frame
    • Sony Alpha Full Frame Cameras
    • Sony Alpha Full Frame Lenses
  • Sony Alpha APS-C / Sony NEX
    • Sony Alpha APS-C and NEX Cameras
    • Sony Alpha APS-C Lenses
  • Sony A-Mount
    • Sony A-Mount System
  • Sony Alpha Post Processing
    • Sony Alpha RAW Converting and Image Editing
  • Adapting Lenses
    • Legacy Lenses
    • Adapters & Speedboosters
    • Showcase Adapted Lenses
  • Showcase Sony Alpha Photos
    • People
    • Nature & Wildlife
    • Landscape & Travel
    • Architecture
    • Misc
  • Sony Alpha Video
    • Sony Alpha Video Discussion
    • Video Showcase
  • About the Sony Alpha Forum
    • About the Sony Alpha Forum
    • Newbie / Self Introduction

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location


Interests

Found 2 results

  1. This one is a lens for which there aren't many samples or blog posts about, so let's try to make up for that. It is very light and well balanced on the A7r: I even managed to shot with it at 1/4s without IBIS. Colors It has the usual Zeiss colors, possibly even more so than my other Contax glass. There is a tiny bit of CA, but Lightroom gets usually rid of it just using the automatic settings. Vignetting Like most extreme wide angles without a connection with the camera (meaning: lenses for which the processor in the camera compensate this automatically even for raw files) it does have quite a bit of vignetting (this was a yellow-ish ceiling; in actual pictures the effect is basically unnoticeable from f/8). But just shooting a blank, out of focus A4 sheet of paper I created a DNG Flat Field correction file for each aperture. As you can see this eliminates the problem entirely. Besides, in real subjects it is hardly noticeable, and quite often improves them IMO. First picture straight out of camera, second picture after correction with FlatField Lightroom plugin. The few remaining "shadows" are actually imperfections in the ceiling itself. f/4 f/5.6 f/8 f/11 Vignetting in real life To perfectly clear the vignetting you'll need to stop down to f/11, even though already from f/8 is pretty much gone (all images uncorrected). f/4 f/5.6 f/8 f/11 Sharpness The lens is decently (for a Zeiss, so really good for other manufacturers) sharp at f/4, and at its best already at f/5.6. f/8 is barely distinguishable from f/5.6 in terms of sharpness (less vignetting, though). It looses just a tiny bit of sharpening at f/16 and more so at f/22, but it is still quite usable even if it will require a tad more coarse (i.e. for example a radius of 1 instead of 0.5) sharpening. Great news for landscape photographers! It is super sharp in the center, pretty sharp at the borders, and reasonably sharp in the extreme corners. Not bad at all for an 18mm, IMO. Besides, it even sharpens up considerably at shorter distances (where, btw, you will most of the time have a subject with a lens this short unless you're shooting large landscapes). I've used it for a "grunge" (or "weird", if you prefer ) male portrait with a LED continuous light and at 1.600 Iso I had to add luminosity noise reduction not because of noise (there wasn't any) but to REDUCE the sharpness...otherwise the facial hairs looked over-sharpened even with the sharpening set at the Lightroom super conservative default level. Smearing and magenta cast I can't see any smearing or magenta shift at the borders, even on the snow. Flare It appears to handle flair from exceptionally well to exceptionally badly (see next post); thankfully most times all it takes is a minute change in framing to go from the latter to the former. Distortion Distortion, as you may already know given it is kinda of a legendary pros of this lens, is basically invisible. For now I'm quite satisfied with my purchase; it is not a Contax 21mm in terms of corner sharpness, and that I already knew, but neither it is a 21mm in terms of price, weight and size. For me the tradeoff is well worth the loss of a bit of quality for the possibility to actually have the lens with me, instead that at home in the camera closet.
  2. This wasn't exactly a cheap lens not even when new - if I remember correctly it used to cost something like 2.400€ in today's money or maybe even a tad more - , and it is still not a cheap lens even used: if you can find one, it will go anywhere from 500€ to 700€ and more. But it is worth every penny IMHO. It is compact, super sharp even wide open, with tons of micro-contrast and, typically for a Sonnar, it exhibit a beautiful bokeh. It is at its sharpest between 100 and 200mm, and according to the MTF data measured by Zeiss it should be a bit less sharp at 300mm, but I honestly haven't been able to spot the difference! At 300mm you will be more likely to loose sharpness because of the air between you and your subject if shooting from a distance than from anything else anyway. Look at the first picture: this kind of rendering is almost impossible to squeeze out from many other lenses, that will render the clouds soft and mushy even after a ton of post processing. This lens in my book has only a couple of faults: - it lacks a lens mount; you can probably get away without one, but it is not for the faint of heart. No big deal, there are cheap (~30€) aftermarket alternatives that work pretty good (even if then with the lens collar your lens will become a 135-300mm, because the collar locks on the first part of the lens). - wide open it might exhibit sometimes a strange "light arc" that is really difficult to get rid of in the threshold between the uniformly illuminated image and the start of the vignetting. You have to see it, it is difficult to describe, but it looks a bit like an arc of "positive" vignetting, i.e. of a lighter area instead of a shadowed one, some kind of overcorrection of the vignetting just before the proper vignetting starts. - not really a negative point for a 300mm lens of this quality, but while pretty compact (more so than many 70-200 lenses, even mf ones!) it is still fairly heavy at more than 900g. I use it on the A7r, 99% of the time on a tripod (the last shot was hand-held though) but it will be best mated with a body with IBIS for an easier time focusing and shooting at 300mm. P.s.: sorry for the compression artifacts on the 2nd shot, I can't see them in the exported image but they show up when I upload the image here...
×
×
  • Create New...