Jump to content

Chrissie

Members
  • Content Count

    333
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

Chrissie last won the day on February 2

Chrissie had the most liked content!

About Chrissie

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Switzerland

Recent Profile Visitors

904 profile views
  1. The result of the first formatting on your computer will be overwritten by the second formatting inside the body. So you might just as well skip the first step. 8-p Since we are talking about using a card in a Sony body, I would stick with Sony's recommendation, which explicitely states: There is a slight (non-zero) chance, that Sony has not fully implemented the SD card standard as recommended by the SD Association. In that case I would expect, that Sony knows best what Sony cameras require. But - see my tag line - give both methods a try and decide on your own.
  2. The general advice is, to always format SD cards in-camera, not outside of the camera. Some people are concerned about wasting one of the limited write cycles which sd-cards are able to sustain. Personally I don't share those concerns as I don't shoot that much as to likely hit that limit. That said: formatting a card does count as one of those write cycles. The benefit of formatting is, that you eliminate fragmentation of the available free space, which might otherwise become an issue when recording movies. If you want to record the same content to two cards simultaneously, you will have to wait for the slowest one to complete its write. How could it be otherwise? On that note, it doesn't (in my view) make sense to spend somewhere in the four-digit price range on a body and lenses, and then crippling that investment by trying to save a two-digit figure on an inadequate memory card.
  3. Because they want to syphon off a copy of your private data. That's why. From the end user's point of view this may be considered a bug, while from Sony's perspective it's the whole point in offering this "free" service. For those of you who haven't read Sony's Online "privacy" policy: you can still do so at any time here. I particularly liked the following sentence:
  4. You shouldn't. This is a frequent reaction that's known as buyer's remorse. While waiting for the ordered items to arrive, just think of all the beautifuls shots you are going to make. 8-)
  5. You may want to bookmark this (online help guide).
  6. Sorry, zalle. Since there is an infinite amount of effects which might play a role here, I'm unable to positively select the one which is to blame. It's far easier, to recognize the ones which do/can not contribute. That process is called "elimination". If you can eliminate enough different effects, eventually you'll end up with the only remaining one which is to blame. I'm aware, that this probably is a highly unsatisfactory answer, but again: sorry I can't do any better. On a related note: actually I never ran the batteries on my a9 down to 50% or lower. I always put them in the charger before that mark. I'm gonna give that a try from now on ...
  7. Negative. The so-called "memory effect" only occurs in NiCd or NiMH batteries, not in Li-Ion type batteries like those used in the Sony.
  8. That would let the printer do the necessary upscaling, because you cannot increase the information content as given by your camera's sensor, measured in [pixels], regardless of how much you blow up the printed image. Think of: pixel zoom. the printer can't deviate from it's physical resolution. That means, it needs "some" information for each of it's physical output pixels. An alternative solution, which would be entirely within your hands is, to resize the pixel image prior to uploading it to the copy shop. A "Resize" function is offered by almost all popular image processing software like Paintshop Pro, Paint.Net, Capture One, and certainly many others as well. To avoid any loss in image quality you would still have to know the printers native resolution in [dpi]. It's probably given in the fine print of the print shop's web presence.
  9. Was that too complicated? Then please do ask.
  10. The a7riii has an image resolution of 7952 x 5304 pixels or "dots". That's a property of the camera. When it comes to printing a digital image, you are dealing with the output resolution of the printing device as well, which is typically measured in "dpi", which stands for dots per inch. The dpi capability of a printer is a property of the printer. Let's assume, for the purpose of this example, that the printer has a physical resolution of 600 dpi. Then the maximum image size would be (7952 / 600) inch by (5304 / 600) inch, which would be something like 13.5 inch by 9 inch. If you are requesting a larger image like, for instance, 30 inch by 20 inch, then you would have to supply a (30 x 600) by (20 x 600) pixel image to a 600 dpi printer. That's 18000 by 12000 pixels, something even an a7riii can't deliver. I would try to talk to the shop offering the printing service, if they can reduce their dpi requirement to a lower number. That would be spreading the available pixels "thinner" across the desired image size in inch.
  11. Plainly advising him to RTFM, even I would have considered rude. So I explicitly linked the online, searchable user manual which you are probably thinking of.
  12. This is what Sony claims on their "Full Specifications and Features" page: So, in terms of frame rate, the HDMI output indeed seems to not go beyond 60p. That said: if the camera can record at 120fps, then there must be a file sitting on your memory card afterwards, which holds all 120 frames per second for the duration of the clip. Regarding the playback at 120 fps, you would at least need a computer whose video ouput (including monitor) is capable of refreshing 120 times per second. Expect a considerable load on the rest of the system (CPU, sustained data rate from disk etc.) as well.
×
×
  • Create New...