Jump to content

Lens for A6500


User07
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,

 

I am newbie in this Forum and also thinking of starting a videography. I have ordered a Sony a6500 body only which will arrive in few days. However i have not decided which lens to go with. I did a research in Google and Youtube and made my mind not going with the kit lens 16-50mm. Rather i though of buying an adapter for canon/ Sigma and also buying Canon 50mm for now (because this lens is cheap)..

 

Do you guys have any thoughts on this combo? A6500 + canon 50mm?? I don't know much about lenses and camera stuffs as i am new in this and starting to learn.. I also don't have enough budget for now to buy an expensive lens (250-$300 for now which i will upgrade later).

 

So any recommendations for a begineer? I just want to have a very nice quality lens which can have decent video quality with a blur in background and also without breaking a bank.

 

I hope you understand where i'm standing right now and recommend me some good lens choices from where i can learn and play around to capture nice video and without breaking a bank. :)

 

Thanks in advance..

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I bought the 18-105 lens with the camera and though it may not be the sharpest, it auto-focuses and follows the subject beautifully and reaches those further shots you'd have to move up on to get, but no time to do so.

 

I bought a Sigma 30mm 1.4 thinking I would get better bokeh but soon realized the camera is so sensitive it was simpler to, rather than change lenses (and risk dust on the sensor) I just move back with the 18-105 (even though it's an f4) and get the same bokeh effect by zooming in. Plus the Sigma is noisy while in continuous auto-focus mode! Yes, it is sharper, but always hunting for focus, making a small buzzing noise! That's a wasted $300! I do shoot with separate sound but that buzzing really buzzes me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I surmise you haven't run a thorough search of 

this topic ... canon adapted lenses on a Sony ... 

just within the forum. Do it, and you will realize 

that such adapting is NOT for users who expect 

a seamless and fully operational union of lens 

and camera. 

  

Some users who already own the canon lenses 

find that the result is "not so bad" for only the

price of the adapter. But if you hafta also buy the 

Canon lenses, you will find that the operational 

level is not at all worth what you're paying.   

  

IOW, buying a Sony to use with your existing

collection of Canon lenses is sometimes a good 

[not perfect] plan, but doing it in reverse, buying

a set of Canon lenses to use on a Sony, is never 

a good plan.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

18-105 would be my recommendation. I used to have one on my α6xxx cameras before I sold them all to get the α9.

 

The 18-105 is light, balances well with the camera and has a useful focal range. I would go with that rather than an adapted lens, especially for video. It’s worth shopping around for this lens as there are sometimes good deals on used equipment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I recently got an a7cii and to pair with the compact body, I thought of getting 2 of the trio compact lenses, 24mm F2.8 and 40mm F4.0. (I already have a 70-200mm) However I stumbled upon the newly released 24-50mm F2.8 G. I'm not sure which to get - I like the small factor of the prime lenses ON the body because it's discreet and helps me blend in as an average tourist / doesn't make it obvious when doing street. But if I add the dimensions of the 2 primes together, it takes up more space in the bag than the zoom lens. BUT THEN, the weight of the 2 prime lenses is 110g lesser than the zoom lens. The zoom lens has the added benefit of being more versatile.   So now I'm stumped. Each has their pros and cons and I can't decide which to get. I'd like to hear the views of you guys who are more experts at this.   Edit: I'm a bit concerned about weight because the last time I went overseas my shoulders were aching from carrying too much. Which is why I was looking for small compact primes in the first place.
    • Hi, I have got a6300 which shutter stopped working. I managed to change shutter but unfortunatelly broke shutter motor tape but I fixed that. After repair the shutter is working but not in a proper way, watch with sound. I bought the second shutter and tried to test it before dissaembling again and it doesn't react to magnet but it works fine when I apply 3V. Are there different type of shutter for a6000 - a6400? Back to the question what is wrong with my shutter after first repair? I don't want to put next shutter unfoundedly. Do your sony cameras perform such a self-check after start up?  IMG_5579 (1).webm
    • PRIVATE\M4ROOT\CLIP I had the same issue Couldnt find the videos  even thought it played on the camera  found them all in here   
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...