Jump to content

Sensor Gel Stick for Sony Cameras WARNING


Recommended Posts

I created an account to warn everyone who will listen. The last few months have been a nightmare come true.

 

To give you some background, I am a semi-professional landscape photographer who has been shooting for about five years. I purchased a Sony a7s in late 2015 and shot for roughly a year and a half before my camera needed a wet cleaning. I had a few welded dust specs that dry methods could not remove. I, like many others, feared giving my sensor a wet cleaning, so I looked into other options. I came across the sensor gel stick for Sony cameras and saw that it had a few good reviews and was being sold by one of the popular photography educators (a simple google search for Sony sensor gel sticks will lead you to his site). I decided to give it a try. I ordered direct from his site.

 

From watching videos, it seemed like a foolproof method. I placed the gel stick on the first dust spec, expecting it to be removed without issue. To my shock, the gel stick stuck to the sensor. I immediately panicked and pulled the gel stick off with a fair amount of force and to my horror, it left a large smear of residue. At this point, I stopped thinking clearly and placed the gel stick on one of the sticky pads, thinking that it would make the gel stick usable. I proceeded to place the gel stick on the sensor once again, and to my dismay, it stuck to the sensor once again. I don't think I've been so angry and shocked in my life. I waited until morning to cool down before I shot an email to the photographer. He proceeded to refund my account and told me a simple wet cleaning would fix the problem. He said that the problem was that my sensor had never been wet cleaned, so the gel stick would stick to it. Not wanting to take any chances, I sent my camera into Sony's repair service provider. I received my camera back after a few weeks. To my dismay, the sensor was clean but it had a few new dust specs, plus there was a very faint mark at the bottom of the sensor. I thought maybe they didn't get all of the residue. I sent it back in, but received it in roughly the same condition.

 

I concluded that the only way forward was for me to remove the specs and mark myself. I decided that since I would be doing the wet cleaning, I might as well give the gel stick another try on the dust specs since the sensor now had two wet cleanings performed on it. To add insult to injury, the gel stick left more marks, though not as bad as the first time. That was the last try for the gel stick. I went ahead with a wet cleaning. I used a few different products to remove the residue and dust. The mark was unable to be removed. At that time, I realized the mark was not residue but rather a scratch. The scratch is located exactly where I first placed the gel stick. I sent the photographer an email about this and received no response back. The product is still being sold on his website with the same disclaimer that he is not responsible for any damage from use of the product.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

While I appreciate the warning, it would be of far more use if you named the product that gave you problems. It matters not who sells it, but if a product is not fit for purpose, or is misleading in any way, in its claims of efficacy or if its instructions or warnings are inaccurate or misleading then that product should be withdrawn.

 

Potential users have the right to read reviews and make their own decisions as to purchase and use of products, and a fair accurate review of products should never shy away from naming the product under review

Link to post
Share on other sites

My understanding is there are different configurations for different sensors. One red. One blue. I also read that there are companies duplicating / mimicking (bootlegging, if you will) the product. As the post above suggests, NAME names and product info. Without such we have no idea if you bought legitimate product for correct (red vs. blue) application.

 

I've wet cleaned my sensor when it was needed and haven't destroyed things. Be certain to do the in camera cleaning routine first but DO NOT POWER OFF CAMERA as instructed before cleaning. Sensor is locked rigid and won't get stressed when wet cleaned. Powering off restores sensor to free wiggle state which is not what you want when wet swabbing across the face.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have cleaned many sensors with a "gel stick" type cleaner and I cant see one causing a scratch. You don't and for

a intents and purposes can't drag the tacky surface of a "gel stick across the surface of the sensor. I would look

else where for the source of the scratch. Now I know there are some knock off products that may be too tacky to

safely clean a sensor so buyer be ware. I parrot both adwb & VTC with a request for more information on the product in

question.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The sensor dust is really a downside of mirroless cameras... Have to clean my Sony A7 at least onces a week and often times still have to remove dust in Photoshop. Only used dry cleaning methods for now... Does anybody have a recommendation what works the best?

 

This gel stick seems to be the one Philip Bloom has used in one of his videos. Any other recommendations?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I have Cleaned sensors for about a 10 years by now. The best product I have ever had is the Artic Butterfly.

 

It's easy, it's fast and it's safe. The only downside is it's not wet cleaning, so any water droops of moist residue need a wet cleaning, but for anything else Artic Butterfly is simply the best I have ever used.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've read that this stick is one of the few serious ones and that you should be really careful with using other cheap ones from Ebay/Amazon:

 

https://photographylife.com/product/sensor-gel-stick-for-sony/

 

I have used this one with no problems and also have the blue one which I used for years on my Leica's. The Orange one is specifically made for the Sony sensors and has a lot less 'stick' to it. I certainly wouldn't trust any cheap ebay/amazon versions

Link to post
Share on other sites

The sensor dust is really a downside of mirroless cameras... Have to clean my Sony A7 at least onces a week and often times still have to remove dust in Photoshop. Only used dry cleaning methods for now... Does anybody have a recommendation what works the best?

 

This gel stick seems to be the one Philip Bloom has used in one of his videos. Any other recommendations?

 

My god his whole cleaning method was probably getting more dust on the camera than taking it off, waving it around just leaving it open with the sensor area facing upwards and breathing all over the opening. Honestly I have had to use my gel stick twice in the last year and half and my cameras get used nearly every day. Half the secret is keeping the lens caps and back of the lens clean and usually a good puff with a filtered blower will get most stuff off. Always keep the camera opening facing down unless sensor cleaning

Link to post
Share on other sites

All that plus he's cleaning it OUTDOORS! Is that a roadway or a beach in the background? Audio pattern across the mic tells of wind blowing like mad and everything carried by wind is bound to wind up in the camera. Not to mention sweating like a pig into it being 29/85º in shade while he's under direct sun. The rattling of the sensor as he shakes it around makes me cringe. This guy's a CLOWN if not a certified MORON.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I used the Photography Life sensor gel stick.  A lot of people seem to have used it with no complaints, but unfortunately, I wasn't one of them.  Please see the attached photo.  

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, atxhiker said:

I used the Photography Life sensor gel stick.  A lot of people seem to have used it with no complaints, but unfortunately, I wasn't one of them.  Please see the attached photo.  

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Very sad. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, adwb said:

I fail to understand why ,when this post was started at in April 2017, only now the brand gets named ?

 

Your comment shows exactly why it took two years.  I never go on forums because of the criticism people receive for just trying to help out.  I didn’t see any of the replies until yesterday.  Why don’t you try a constructive response now that is actually on topic?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you care to read the replies you got in response to your post you will see that  I replied on the 17th of April 2017.

If you do not give us the information with which we can attempt to help , or as in your case where you appeared to be wanting to warn other users about a product while withholding the brand name makes your post effectively useless or the purpose you intended.

Do not bother to reply to me as I have unsubscribed from this thread 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to say, I would never in a million years use a gel stick on any camera sensor. This graduated approach has worked for me over the last 15 years. 1. Use the sensor clean routine in camera, check if worked. 2. If no use a hand blower bulb, check if worked. 3. If no use Visible Dust sensor brush (either Arctic Butterfly or another of their brushes, check if worked. 4. If no, wet clean following instructions to the letter and using Visible Dust swabs and their cleaning fluid. This is not rocket science.

If you think about it, a gel stick is not going to remove a spot welded to the sensor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 2/13/2019 at 11:28 PM, adwb said:

If you care to read the replies you got in response to your post you will see that  I replied on the 17th of April 2017.

If you do not give us the information with which we can attempt to help , or as in your case where you appeared to be wanting to warn other users about a product while withholding the brand name makes your post effectively useless or the purpose you intended.

Do not bother to reply to me as I have unsubscribed from this thread 

I was afraid my original post would be removed by a mod if I included the brand name.  People probably would have questioned my credibility if I attacked a brand and was a new forum member.  I responded with the brand name within a couple of days on other forums like dp review.  This forum slipped by me.  Like I said, I don't get on these forums much.  I still believe that it's better to respond late than never. 

I strongly disagree my post was effectively useless.  I provided enough hints as to who the seller was.  You could only buy gel sticks from a couple of sources, and Nasim Mansurov was the only photographer selling them.  A potential buyer would have been able to figure that out.  Anymore criticism?

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, chardinej said:

I have to say, I would never in a million years use a gel stick on any camera sensor. This graduated approach has worked for me over the last 15 years. 1. Use the sensor clean routine in camera, check if worked. 2. If no use a hand blower bulb, check if worked. 3. If no use Visible Dust sensor brush (either Arctic Butterfly or another of their brushes, check if worked. 4. If no, wet clean following instructions to the letter and using Visible Dust swabs and their cleaning fluid. This is not rocket science.

If you think about it, a gel stick is not going to remove a spot welded to the sensor.

I use the same approach now.  If you reread my original post, the intention of the gel stick was to remove welded dust specs, not spots.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'd use Focus Area: (Expand) Flexible Spot: S instead of Center. Smaller focus area and more control over where to focus. https://helpguide.sony.net/ilc/1710/v1/en/contents/TP0001653124.html
    • New Sony user here, trying to get my head around all of the differences from Fuji 😬  I’ve figured out most of the settings, but can’t find any answers on how to do a custom white balance for studio flash. The custom setting option only seems to be based on measuring ambient light. The only workaround I can think of is to set an approximate kelvin value and then shoot a grey card and fix it in post, but I’d much prefer to get it right in camera.    camera is an A7CR TIA Vinnie 
    • I am not sure what effect you are trying to achieve regarding the bluish cast of the water.  Do you want to neutralize it or enhance it?  It would be best if you Google polarizer filter for camera and look at the images and videos and see if you can find the desired effect that seem to mirror your situation.  If you can't find the effect you are looking for, it may not be possible to do so with the Polarizer.  I use the polarizer to minimize the shimmering reflections in the water that would look distracting in the image. Neutral density filters are used to reduce the amount of light coming into the camera.  If you want to shoot a small waterfall and you want to create an angel veil effect by reducing the shutter speed to seconds but the light conditions won't allow you to do so, you can use neutral density filters to shoot at very slow shutter speeds. Neutral density and polarizing filters can get very expensive.  If your lenses share a common filter size, that would be great.  If not, get the filters for the largest filter diameter lens and get a set of stepping rings to use with your smaller filter diameter lenses.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...