Jump to content

Hoya Red Intensifier for night shoots


glowinthedark
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys

 

I've read about a special Hoya filter, intended to be used for portrait or general landscape (especially in fall) photography: The "Hoya RA54 Red Enhancer (Intensifier)"

 

he original article that gave me that idea can be found here: http://www.lonelyspeck.com/hoya-intensifier-review-an-affordable-light-pollution-filter-for-astrophotography/

 

Now, I did some own comparison, to get an idea how well it works. First I compared the filter's properties with the emission line of a sodium light source; these nasty orange light you will anywhere in cities. Usually you can be miles away and still have a significant amount of orange glow in your picture.

The transmission properties of that particular filter seems promising. At 590nm wavelength (the emission maximum of a sodium lo pressure light source), we only have roughly 40% transmission while other wavelengths are only slightly affected. But what does it mean...? Well, that enables you to selectively cancel out a certain colour, in that case the annoying light of that sodium light source. Since it still has 40% transmission, you will not remove all of it, but for 30-60 € (depending of the diameter you need) it improves you pictures quite a lot.

 

Take a look at these pictures, showing a 250000-people city in central Europe (a heavy example of light pollution indeed):

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

 

 

All pictures were taken with a RX10, white balance set to cloudy (just to avoid the camera having any influence to the result), 8 seconds/ f2.8

 

I know, these are quite challenging conditions, with the city directly in front of you. If you use it in more typical scenarios, that filter should really do a good job removing the vast majority of orange-ish light form your night shoot. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I use the same 67mm filter on the Rokinon 12mm F2 for most of my star trail or milky way shots. The UAE, were I take most of the pics, are one of the most light polluted countries in the world and we have a huge number of sodium based light sources as all highways are fully lit up during the night. The filter is definitely worth every cent. I believe Norman from lonelyspeck also recently launched a special square light pollution filter. Tempted to try that one on the 70-200GM for deep sky pics.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

The light pollution map is fascinating, and people seem so obsessed with light these days. I live on the edge of a major city, Leeds UK, in what could loosely be classed as a village but people have so much house area illumination, if they want to live in the equivalent of permanent daylight why don't they stay in inner cities? what is wrong with darkness?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I recently got an a7cii and to pair with the compact body, I thought of getting 2 of the trio compact lenses, 24mm F2.8 and 40mm F4.0. (I already have a 70-200mm) However I stumbled upon the newly released 24-50mm F2.8 G. I'm not sure which to get - I like the small factor of the prime lenses ON the body because it's discreet and helps me blend in as an average tourist / doesn't make it obvious when doing street. But if I add the dimensions of the 2 primes together, it takes up more space in the bag than the zoom lens. BUT THEN, the weight of the 2 prime lenses is 110g lesser than the zoom lens. The zoom lens has the added benefit of being more versatile.   So now I'm stumped. Each has their pros and cons and I can't decide which to get. I'd like to hear the views of you guys who are more experts at this.   Edit: I'm a bit concerned about weight because the last time I went overseas my shoulders were aching from carrying too much. Which is why I was looking for small compact primes in the first place.
    • Hi, I have got a6300 which shutter stopped working. I managed to change shutter but unfortunatelly broke shutter motor tape but I fixed that. After repair the shutter is working but not in a proper way, watch with sound. I bought the second shutter and tried to test it before dissaembling again and it doesn't react to magnet but it works fine when I apply 3V. Are there different type of shutter for a6000 - a6400? Back to the question what is wrong with my shutter after first repair? I don't want to put next shutter unfoundedly. Do your sony cameras perform such a self-check after start up?  IMG_5579 (1).webm
    • PRIVATE\M4ROOT\CLIP I had the same issue Couldnt find the videos  even thought it played on the camera  found them all in here   
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...