Jump to content

Sony Zeiss Planar T* FE 50mm F1.4 ZA


Recommended Posts

Hey there

 

Just got my FE 50/1.4 ZA yesterday, haven't had much time to shoot with it yet unfortunately, but took a few shots in my backyard for test purposes.

 

Here's a quick test shot with it wide open, nothing special but you may be able to get a glimpse of its character:

 

28133583693_714802f40d_b.jpg

Blueberries [explored] by Mathias, auf Flickr

 

Love the rendering and the colors, very soft bokeh too (no swirly-bokeh and no onion-rings!).

AF seems on par with the FE35/1.4 and manual focus is great too, seems to be linear (180° throw), but need to test more.

The aperture ring is designed like the one on the 85GM, unlike the FE35/1.4 - I prefer this one, as the ribs go all around the ring which is more ergonomic.

In these first simple shots I couldn't find anything not to like... Haven't come across CA either... Will update when I have more.

 

Please share your images and opinions about this beautiful new lens.

 

 

Oh and make sure to enter my Flickr group if you shoot this lens too: https://www.flickr.com/groups/3010731@N20/

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's gorgeous. I would like to have this lens, but the cost is just too much. I already have the 55mm Zeiss, and the only thing I don't really like about it is the minimum focus distance is actually pretty long. Now, when Sony starts making some f/1.2 lenses that have a t stop rating of 1.2... I'll probably sell my first born to get a set of those. I can imagine eye AF with a native f/1.2 would be amazing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also own the 35/1.4, which was my favorite lens so far. Let's see if the 50 can top it though...

The 85GM is next on my wish list. So we would end up with the same set - which is not surprising of course :)

Yeah I feel you about that 24-70/4... My only zoom is the 16-35/4 (which is great though).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Beautiful shots. I agree regarding the rendering and the color.

I don't own the 35/1.4, but could you please describe the AF for the 50 in terms of the speed of the 85GM?

 

Paul

Thank you. Unfortunately I can't comment on the AF performance in terms of the 85, as I don't own the GM. It's more relying and faster than the 90/2.8 Macro though.

Tracking works fine, but it takes a while to go from mfd to infinity. It's also slightly more noisy than the linear piezo drives (35/1.4).

 

Oh by the way, Manual focus is definitely linear! 180 degree throw no matter how fast or slow you turn that focus ring.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just got mine yesterday and took just a few shots on a short evening walk.  Focus speed not fantastic but okay.  Sharpness fine at 1.4 - 2.0, really sharp 2.8 - 8.  Bokeh nice.  Most of all, and what I bought the sense hoping to get, the Zeiss 3D pop is clearly there.  Here is not a great pic but it is straight out of the camera and shows you the pop . . .  

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's another quick test pic straight OOC, this one at f/4 (pic above was wide open).

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you're looking through the front element at the aperture, opening it up can you too still see the blades even wide open at f/1.4? Just want to check if this is normal behavior (I think other lenses do the same, but am not sure).

Link to post
Share on other sites

The blades open up as I turn the aperture ring toward f/1.4.  At f/1.4, they almost but not quite disappear--I can still barely see the edges.

 

When yours is autofocusing, do you notice a minor noise (like a faint rubbing / grinding) ?  Lots of people have complained of pretty loud or harsh scraping / grinding with the 85mm 1.4 GM, but mine is not that bad.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for checking. Seems to be normal, guess the inner barrel is a bit larger than f/1.4, so the blades are still visible. Read the same for some other lenses, including Leica and Zeiss.

 

About the AF: Yes, it's a bit noisy. It uses the same AF tech as the 85GM (Ring SSM vs. direct drive SSM on others). I think it's okay, not too loud, eventually it will get quieter over time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for checking. Seems to be normal, guess the inner barrel is a bit larger than f/1.4, so the blades are still visible. Read the same for some other lenses, including Leica and Zeiss.

About the AF: Yes, it's a bit noisy. It uses the same AF tech as the 85GM (Ring SSM vs. direct drive SSM on others). I think it's okay, not too loud, eventually it will get quieter over time.

To have 4 engines to pull full size suv doesn't make sense to me

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I recently got an a7cii and to pair with the compact body, I thought of getting 2 of the trio compact lenses, 24mm F2.8 and 40mm F4.0. (I already have a 70-200mm) However I stumbled upon the newly released 24-50mm F2.8 G. I'm not sure which to get - I like the small factor of the prime lenses ON the body because it's discreet and helps me blend in as an average tourist / doesn't make it obvious when doing street. But if I add the dimensions of the 2 primes together, it takes up more space in the bag than the zoom lens. BUT THEN, the weight of the 2 prime lenses is 110g lesser than the zoom lens. The zoom lens has the added benefit of being more versatile.   So now I'm stumped. Each has their pros and cons and I can't decide which to get. I'd like to hear the views of you guys who are more experts at this.   Edit: I'm a bit concerned about weight because the last time I went overseas my shoulders were aching from carrying too much. Which is why I was looking for small compact primes in the first place.
    • Hi, I have got a6300 which shutter stopped working. I managed to change shutter but unfortunatelly broke shutter motor tape but I fixed that. After repair the shutter is working but not in a proper way, watch with sound. I bought the second shutter and tried to test it before dissaembling again and it doesn't react to magnet but it works fine when I apply 3V. Are there different type of shutter for a6000 - a6400? Back to the question what is wrong with my shutter after first repair? I don't want to put next shutter unfoundedly. Do your sony cameras perform such a self-check after start up?  IMG_5579 (1).webm
    • PRIVATE\M4ROOT\CLIP I had the same issue Couldnt find the videos  even thought it played on the camera  found them all in here   
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...