Jump to content

Zeiss Loxia 50mm f/2


JimmyD
 Share

Recommended Posts

Picked up my Loxia 50mm today and took a few quick shots. Oh my! Instantly my favorite lens for the A7R (and I suspect it will be for my A7MkII as well). In my 45 years of photography I have literally shot 100's of manual and auto focus primes (Leica, Zeiss, Nikon, Canon, Olympus, Minolta, etc.), and IMHO the Loxia 50 is as good overall as any of them and much better than most. I have the Sony/Zeiss 55mm f/1.8 "baby Otus" and love it as well (largely for its wide aperture sharpness), but it makes more clinical images compared to the classic rendering of the Loxia.

 

The Loxia balances perfectly on the A7R. The lens is mechanical perfection. Focus is easier and faster than any other MF lens I've ever used, especially with the A7R auto zoom in feature when you turn the focus ring. Colors are amazing. A tad soft in the extreme corners when I shot a brick wall wide open as you would suspect, but otherwise very sharp and contrasty. Very, very usable in real life straight from f/2. Wow--can't wait for the Loxia 85mm and 25mm !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I concur 100%. The Loxia 50 is a delightful lens. It does not emphasize detail or sharpness the way a FE 55 f:1.8 does, but presents the image in a holistic way, and one can't fail to enjoy the lovely colours (much better in this respect than the FE IMHO). One area where Jimmy and I differ is that the Loxia has weaker contrast than most Zeiss lenses I have used, again IMHO. Certainly much weaker than, for example, Contax G 45 f:2.0. This is not a weakness, merely a design choice. As pics were requested, one of Notre-Dame, in Paris.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Been asked to post some pics.  Here are a couple quick JPGs, both at ISO and with minimal PP.  The statue was at f/2; the Port of Tacoma was at f/5.6.  Not great shots as I was just trying to do a quick test, but shows some of the capabilities of the lens.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Turtle, I couldn't agree more. My dream kit is a Loxia 85 1.8 and 25 2 to go along with the 50 2. Right now for my light kit I am using a Zeiss ZM 85 4 and an Oly 24 2.8, both with Novoflex adapters. All very light with great IQ, it's just that the auto zoom feature when you turn the focus ring on the Loxia makes focusing a dream.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Just got mine  :D   looks great. This is really how a modern manual focus lens should be implemented. I think Leica gets some problems from this series ... especially if Sony/Zeiss can put out a Rangefinderish camera (A9 perhaps).

 

 

 

At f2.0 which I know because its written in the Metadata!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

I'm really enjoying this lens. Just noticed the Bokeh is showing the aperture blade patten quite strongly, I think close focus is a factor. Just shoot wide open I guess, which is in the third shot - I've never seen anything like this before, quite an effect.

 

Focal distance around 50cm, f2 (except for the one at f2.8).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I recently got an a7cii and to pair with the compact body, I thought of getting 2 of the trio compact lenses, 24mm F2.8 and 40mm F4.0. (I already have a 70-200mm) However I stumbled upon the newly released 24-50mm F2.8 G. I'm not sure which to get - I like the small factor of the prime lenses ON the body because it's discreet and helps me blend in as an average tourist / doesn't make it obvious when doing street. But if I add the dimensions of the 2 primes together, it takes up more space in the bag than the zoom lens. BUT THEN, the weight of the 2 prime lenses is 110g lesser than the zoom lens. The zoom lens has the added benefit of being more versatile.   So now I'm stumped. Each has their pros and cons and I can't decide which to get. I'd like to hear the views of you guys who are more experts at this.   Edit: I'm a bit concerned about weight because the last time I went overseas my shoulders were aching from carrying too much. Which is why I was looking for small compact primes in the first place.
    • Hi, I have got a6300 which shutter stopped working. I managed to change shutter but unfortunatelly broke shutter motor tape but I fixed that. After repair the shutter is working but not in a proper way, watch with sound. I bought the second shutter and tried to test it before dissaembling again and it doesn't react to magnet but it works fine when I apply 3V. Are there different type of shutter for a6000 - a6400? Back to the question what is wrong with my shutter after first repair? I don't want to put next shutter unfoundedly. Do your sony cameras perform such a self-check after start up?  IMG_5579 (1).webm
    • PRIVATE\M4ROOT\CLIP I had the same issue Couldnt find the videos  even thought it played on the camera  found them all in here   
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...