Jump to content


Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

Possible three new APS-C E-mount lenses to come in 2015...


  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

#1 SAR_admin

SAR_admin

    Advanced Member

  • Administrators
  • 264 posts

Posted 01 November 2014 - 12:01 PM

Advertisement (Gone after free registration)

That's what a bird whispered into my ears...

25 f1.4
16-50 f2.8 - 4
50-150 f4-5.6

 

All APS-C E-mount!



#2 SAF Admin

SAF Admin

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • 78 posts

Posted 01 November 2014 - 01:23 PM

Sony or Zeiss labelled?


Support the Sony Alpha Forum - at no cost!
Simply use these links to buy via Amazon US or eBay

#3 dp2014

dp2014

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 12 posts

Posted 03 November 2014 - 11:50 PM

25 1.4 would be amazing. Hopefully it's true:D



#4 xtof83

xtof83

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts
  • LocationHy√®res / France

Posted 04 November 2014 - 07:58 AM

All three are wellcome ! waiting for the a7000

Need too a good 15 mm (maybe a Voigt), to come with a 25 and 50-150

Wait and see ...



#5 Philipp_Zieger

Philipp_Zieger

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 5 posts

Posted 08 November 2014 - 01:27 PM

The 25/1.4 with the Quality of the 50/1.8 and half the Price of the Zeiss 24/1.8 would be amazing!


Gesendet mit Tapatalk

#6 tsk1979

tsk1979

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 28 posts

Posted 11 November 2014 - 12:38 PM

I just wish Sony Does a Fuji and gives a 400mm lens for the E/FE. Lack of telephoto is annoying!!!



#7 mikuru

mikuru

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts

Posted 22 November 2014 - 08:08 AM

still no telephoto :( yep really annoying


Fav blog judi online


#8 Herman

Herman

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 14 December 2014 - 12:20 AM

A 150-450 Lens  f4-5.6 with some macro  would just be the cat's meow .Would compete to Panasonics 100-300

 

No matter how nice sony cameras are The lenses are what really makes the picture into a super picture.



#9 kevophoto

kevophoto

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 28 December 2014 - 10:45 PM

Need a Macro, Soon I hope.



#10 alaios

alaios

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 7 posts

Posted 13 January 2015 - 06:56 AM

need a portrait zoom lens



#11 Austerror

Austerror

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 278 posts

Posted 04 February 2015 - 12:47 PM

A 25mm prime... I suspect that will be replacing the 24mm Zeiss.



#12 AJNorth

AJNorth

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 20 posts

Posted 04 February 2015 - 01:04 PM

I've seen a mention of a new 35mm f1.4 FE lens (Zeiss) but not a 25mm?

 

I'm new to sony Mirrorless and just brought an A6000, I've seen you can use an FE lens on an E-Mount, but are there any implications of this? I know a 35mm will result in a 52mm (ish) on an APS sensor, but anything else I should know?

I'd love to have an f1.4.

 

Sorry if that has been answered before.



#13 AJNorth

AJNorth

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 20 posts

Posted 04 February 2015 - 04:48 PM

Sorry, I completely missed that this post is about new E-Mount lenses!

 

Therefore a 25mm 1.4 would be fantastic!



#14 Golem

Golem

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,249 posts

Posted 05 May 2015 - 12:00 AM

 

I've always thunk of the Sony APSc line as the reincarnation

of the Olympus Pen-F line. [The digital Oly Pen is NOT that].

So I never expect a crazy giant lens line like Nikon or Canon.

 

But OTOH, the simple small lens selection for the Pen F was

well balanced as far as it went. The Sony APSc line is NOT.

It's more like a few spotty selections from yet another crazy  

giant lens line that is prolly never gonna exist cuz it will never

be justifiable.

  

Fortunately for myself, I use these bodies mainly as "film  

backs" for adapted legacy lenses, so when the whole thing

goes belly up, and my discontinued batteries no longer take

a charge, I'll just turn to another way of using FF legacy EOS

and Nikon glass ... like EOS and Nikon bodies ?  

 

But for those of you hungering a for modern major system all

based on Sony APSc ? Rotzaruck, amigos. The technology

has that potential, but in the real world, not really realistic.

 



#15 snapdawg

snapdawg

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts

Posted 07 May 2015 - 08:58 AM

I've been shooting NEXes for about 5 years now and regarding the lens lineup especially for the 24MP models we all know the story ... just have a look at what Fuji have managed in 3 years. Anyway, in good light I prefer the output from my Sony sensors and can't wait for some serious fast glass.



#16 ethierbach

ethierbach

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 32 posts

Posted 19 May 2015 - 10:52 PM

That's what a bird whispered into my ears...

25 f1.4
16-50 f2.8 - 4
50-150 f4-5.6

 

All APS-C E-mount!

 

Has this bird done any more whispering?:) The 25 f/1.4 would be tremendous (but pricey?)

 

But what really caught my eye was the 16-50. I'm not all that thrilled with my kit 16-50 PZ, and I've been nosing around for a possible replacement. I've been shooting with 3 primes instead (Sigma 19 and 30, and Sony SEL50F18) but there are times when I don't want to change lenses.

 

So if this rumor is still credible, I might not blow my year's budget on a Zeiss 16-70 just yet.


  • Dennis O likes this

#17 worldpixel

worldpixel

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 39 posts

Posted 20 May 2015 - 11:05 AM

I'm not a sony camera expert but based on what I have read since I first got into photography last may 2014 , things are changing for sony apsc with the amount of people buying the a6000 ( i think ). So hopefully they would take care of the emount apsc market.

 

16-50 f2.8 - 4 > if the image quality is good in this one this would replace my kit.

 

25 1.4 would be the lens that gets used most of the time



#18 worldpixel

worldpixel

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 39 posts

Posted 20 May 2015 - 11:06 AM

Hi , so you have the kit lens and the sel 50 sigma 30 and 19 right.

 

So if you compare the different focal lengths of the kit lens vs

 

sigma 19 vs kitlens 19mm

sigma 30 vs kitlens 30mm

sel50 vs kitlens 50mm

 

I know the sel 50 is very good but is the sigma 19 better than kit 19?

Has this bird done any more whispering?:) The 25 f/1.4 would be tremendous (but pricey?)

 

But what really caught my eye was the 16-50. I'm not all that thrilled with my kit 16-50 PZ, and I've been nosing around for a possible replacement. I've been shooting with 3 primes instead (Sigma 19 and 30, and Sony SEL50F18) but there are times when I don't want to change lenses.

 

So if this rumor is still credible, I might not blow my year's budget on a Zeiss 16-70 just yet.



#19 ethierbach

ethierbach

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 32 posts

Posted 22 May 2015 - 01:51 AM

I know the sel 50 is very good but is the sigma 19 better than kit 19?

 

I seem to get better results with the Sigma. The pictures are much sharper overall, and the corners are no comparison. 

 

I see such varied opinions of the kit lens. I wonder if there are just a bunch of bad copies out there, along with some better ones.



#20 flo

flo

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 30 May 2015 - 08:45 AM

16-50 f2.8 - 4 sounds great to me. But there is a patent by Sigma, for a 18-55 constant 2.8I'm curious about both.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

 
x

New Members Welcome!

Not yet registered? Really?

Registration is free and takes only a few minutes.

After the free registration you can discuss with members from all over the world, put questions and present your images.

We are looking forward to you!

Admin Andreas und Sony Alpha Forum Team

Register now! X